by Jerry Huerta
copyright 2021
The earliest historicists presumed that the structure
of Revelation is the same as Daniel’s book or that the narration repeatedly
backtracks. This pattern is what is known as recapitulation. They held the
seven seals essentially cover the same period as the seven churches and the
trumpets nearly the same period as the seven seals and the vials almost the
same period as the trumpets. In essence, the septets (the seven seals and seven
trumpets and seven vials) fold back on the seven churches in defiance of
specific developmental guidelines.
Indeed, one of the issues in interpreting the
Revelation is “progressive revelation.” The earliest historicists did not
accept the prophetic view of the seven churches. Even so, today, a significant
number acknowledge the progressive revelation that the seven churches represent
prophetic eras, especially as the last one exemplifies our modern-day era of a
market-driven society in the illustration that the church is lukewarm and
maintains they are “rich and increased with goods, and have need of nothing” (Revelation
3:17). That is undoubtedly the character of the prosperity churches today. The
point is that historicism has acknowledged the need to correct previous
misconceptions and we establish our thesis on this principle.
One example of correction is the developmental
guideline in Revelation 4:1, “I will shew thee things which must be hereafter,”
which has never been given proper weight by traditional historicists. They
acknowledge that the seven churches follow a linear narration but dismiss the
developmental guideline of Rev 4:1 and return to the period of the first church
as if the seven seals must follow Christ’s first advent instead of following
the opening of the last church. Our book does not dismiss any developmental
guidelines. It maintains the seals must represent phenomena following the
introduction of the final church, as the trumpets covey the phenomena of the
last seal and the vials the final trumpet. Our restructuring makes our work
unique amongst others of the same subject or school of thought.
This post is a postscript to the book above, which is available here.
No comments:
Post a Comment