Saturday, November 8, 2025

The Mystery of the Seven Heads in Revelation

 


By Marsue and Jerry Huerta

 

 

In Rev 3:18 we are counseled to buy from Christ gold tried in fire and in 1 Cor 3:12-13 the gold tried in fire is defined as doctrine, the beliefs and teachings in Christendom.

 

The doctrines of Christendom throughout time are symbolized as gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble in 1 Cor 3:12. The significance is that the sound beliefs and teaching from Christ are hard to find, while the unfit ones are common and easily found. It’s like the road to salvation that’s hard to find.

 

 

On the subject of the 7 heads, there are a number of Beasts with 7 heads. The one we will focus on is the scarlet beast in Rev 17

 

Revelation 17

7    But the angel said to me, "Why do you marvel? I will tell you the mystery of the woman, and of the beast with seven heads and ten horns that carries her.

8    The beast that you saw was, and is not, and is about to rise from the bottomless pit and go to destruction. And the dwellers on earth whose names have not been written in the book of life from the foundation of the world will marvel to see the beast, because it was and is not and is to come. ESV

 

The reason we use the ESV will become apparent presently. We highlight this beast because it’s uniquely stated that it, was and is not and is to come.  In essence, it has an inactive period and its revived again, which is not the case for the other beasts.  Furthermore, Revelation relates that grasping this mystery (that was, is not, and is to come) exposes the meaning of the seven heads.This is what we see when we continue in Rev 17,

 

Revelation 17

9    This calls for a mind with wisdom: the seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman is seated;

10   they are also seven kings, five of whom have fallen, one is, the other has not yet come, and when he does come he must remain only a little while.

11   As for the beast that was and is not, it is an eighth but it belongs to the seven, and it goes to destruction. ESV

 

Here is why we use the ESV. The KJV translates they are also seven kings as “And there are seven kings” which is poor translation. The KJV confuses the evidence that the seven heads are renamed mountains and then kings, making them a series of appositives. We also see John’s use of appositives in Revelation 12:9. Daniel and John both use the literary device of appositives to hide the prophecies from the powers that be so as to not arouse them to destroy the scriptures. If John had revealed the Dragon was the Roman empire they would have tried to destroy the book.

Let’s return to the passage in Revelation.

 

Now, each of the fallen kings in Revelation 17:10 WAS, AND IS NOT, from John’s POINT OF VIEW, which is the time that the sixth king or head reigns, insomuch as kings reign or have a time in which they hold power over a dominion.

 

Let us emphasize kings reign, they have power and dominion by every definition of the term king. And when it says they are fallen it means that each one was but is not at the time that the sixth king reigns.

 

Again, Revelation 17:10 means that the five kings held power over a dominion that ended before the time of the sixth king, just like the beast that was and is not from John’s POINT OF VIEW. This evidence proves the beast that rises out of the bottomless pit is one of the five kings who have fallen from John’s point of view. In essence, the beast that rises from the bottomless pit cannot be the sixth or seventh king, but must be one of the five kings or heads that reigned before the time of the sixth king, because it was, and is not, while the sixth king is!

 

The evidence that the revived head is one of the five that had fallen seems to evade most expositors, which consigns their doctrine on the seven heads as the common wood, hay and stubble of 1 Cor 3:12. They seem incapable of understanding tenses in grammar: past, present, future–was, is not, and is to come–is insolvable puzzle for the preponderance of expositors.

 

We see this problem especially with the supersessionists and dispensationalists in that they misrepresent that the revived head as the sixth one.

 

Supersessionist Jay Rogers and Daniel Morais hold the revived head is the sixth one, which they interpret as the emperor Nero,

 

Second, John says the eighth “is of the seven” (Revelation 17:11). This is an idiom that we might have difficulty with today. Apparently, he means that the eighth was revealed to him later, but he is of the seven. In other words, the eighth king is one of the seven. He is the king who “is” at the time John is writing Revelation. In other words, the “eighth” that John saw is actually the same emperor as the “sixth.” If this seems to be a stretch to say the eighth “is of the seven,” actually the sixth, compare this with Daniel 7:8.

Jay Rogers, “Notes on Daniel: Interpreting Revelation 17 with Daniel 7,” https://www.forerunner.com/daniel/X0023_Notes_on_Daniel__par

 

As explained in the commentary on Revelation 13, the head of the beast with the “fatal” wound in Revelation 13:3 is generally understood to be Nero who killed himself by stabbing himself in the neck. The healing of the fatal wound is generally understood to refer to the rise of the Flavian Dynasty at the accession of Vespasian… Vespasian must be the seventh, and Titus the eighth head of the beast.

Daniel Morais, “Revelation 17: A Preterist Commentary,” https://www.revelationrevolution.org/revelation-17-a-preterist-commentary/

 

Dispensationalist John Walvoord also treats the sixth head as the revived head,

 

The final form of world government, symbolized by the eighth beast itself, is the world empire of the great tribulation time. The revived Roman Empire which will be in sway immediately after the rapture of the church is apparently indicated by the seventh head, while the beast, described in verse 11 as the eighth, is the world empire, which is destroyed by Jesus Christ at His second coming.

John F. Walvoord, “The Revelation of Jesus Christ,” https://walvoord.com/article/275

 

When Walvoord wrote the revived Roman empire becomes the seventh world empire it’s because the dispensationalists and historicists hold the seven heads or kings as world empires in agreement with Daniel, as opposed to the supersessionists who interpret them simply as Roman emperors. The interpretation that the seven kings are Roman emperors is founded on errors and misrepresentations, which is a subject for future videos. The kingdoms of Babylon, Persia, Greece and Rome in Daniel are renamed as heads, mountains and kings by John according to historicist and dispensationalists, which is the superior interpretation that complements Daniel’s work.

 

And here’s the issue with the supersessionists and dispensationalists. In the case of the supersessionists, how did Titus, whom the supersessionists hold as the revived head, come before Nero? Their doctrines are absent any answer to this because of their error that the sixth king is the one that is revived. If the sixth king or head is interpreted as Nero then the supersessionists have to explain the absurdity of how the Roman emperor Titus came before Nero. And when the dispensationalists interpret the sixth head as the ancient Roman empire they have to explain the absurdity of how a future revived Roman empire “was” before the ancient Roman empire.  

 

Revelation 17:9-11 affirms that the revived beast “was” before the sixth head or king, and if one interprets the sixth king as the Roman Empire then they must explain how the beast that rises out of the bottomless pit reigned before the Roman empire, which leads to all sorts of absurdities in preterism and dispensational futurism.

 

The only way to avoid such absurdities is to realize that John is taken to the future to see the judgment of the harlot Babylon and the passage is a prolepsis, a future act or development that is represented as if already accomplished or existing. Such literary devices are not uncommon in scripture and this is upheld in the evidence that one of the angels with the seven vials or plagues shows John the “judgment” of the harlot,

 

Revelation 17

1   Then one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls came and said to me, "Come, I will show you the judgment of the great prostitute who is seated on many waters,

2   with whom the kings of the earth have committed sexual immorality, and with the wine of whose sexual immorality the dwellers on earth have become drunk." ESV

 

From the historicist and dispensationalist’s rules of interpretation the judgments concerning the final plagues are at the end of this age, not at the beginning as the preterists hold. Here is where our evidence presented in our video “The Philadelphia Church” supports that Rev 17 is a prolepsis, a future perspective. Daniel 12 supports that the trial or judgement related in Rev 17 is at “the time of the end” in which knowledge is increased and men travel to and fro, which we see in modern times beyond anything in the past. Are we to suppose that God did not see that the greatest increases in knowledge and the transversing of the globe occurs in our modern times? If so, then the judgment of the harlot was set for our day, not John’s, and we will affirm this as we continue to produce future videos.

 

Furthermore, the head that is revived was presented in the previous chapter 13 as the beast that rises out of the sea,

 

Revelation 13

3    One of its heads seemed to have a mortal wound, but its mortal wound was healed, and the whole earth marveled as they followed the beast…

 

11   Then I saw another beast rising out of the earth. It had two horns like a lamb and it spoke like a dragon.

12   It exercises all the authority of the first beast in its presence, and makes the earth and its inhabitants worship the first beast, whose mortal wound was healed. ESV

 

The “first beast” in the chapter refers to the beast that rises out of the sea. According to verse 12, it is the head that is revived, which places Chapter 17 in chronological order, specifically around the time when the head is wounded or its power is broken, preceding the reign of the sixth king. This is supported by the detail that when the beast from the sea and the scarlet beast are revived, the world “marvels,” which supports their identity as the same. In other words, in Rev 17, John renames the beast that rises from the sea as the scarlet beast in its wounded period, using the literary device of a prolepsis,

 

Revelation 17

8   The beast that you saw was, and is not, and is about to rise from the bottomless pit and go to destruction. And the dwellers on earth whose names have not been written in the book of life from the foundation of the world will marvel to see the beast, because it was and is not and is to come. ESV

 

Revelation 17:9-11 demands wisdom to understand; it reveals that the series of the beasts in Revelation starts with Daniel’s fourth beast. Daniel’s fourth beast is renamed the dragon in Revelation 12 through the literary device of appositives. Daniel’s little horn is renamed the beast that rises from the sea and is the fifth head, making the sixth head the beast that rises from the earth, and the image becomes the seventh head. Between Daniel and Revelation, we can account for all seven heads. A big part of the mystery of the seven heads is revealed in grasping that Daniel and Revelation complement each other in revealing the “time of the end.”

 

The understanding that John uses the literary devices of appositives and prolepsis, especially in Revelation 17, is as rare and hard to find as gold, silver, and precious stones. The eschatological doctrines of preterism and dispensationalism are as common as wood, hay, and stubble because they fail to grasp the devices in the chapter. It takes wisdom to learn that the fifth head is in our past and that we live in the time of the sixth head in Revelation 17:10.   

 

The exposé that Rev 17 utilizes these literary devices was developed some 60 years or more ago by Historicists like George McCready Price. Citing from Price’s book, Time of the End, concerning the harlot riding the beast, we read, 

 

But, as before stated, the point of time from which the beast and its rider are seen by the apostle is our own day, the time of the end, not the time of the Roman emperors.

George McCready Price, Time of the End (Southern Pub. Association; 1st edition, 1967), 31.

 

 

George McCready Price was a Canadian creationist. He produced a number of anti-evolution and creationist works, principally on the subject of flood geology. Price's defense of creation science first achieved wide notability in 1925 when his theories and arguments were utilized powerfully by William Jennings Bryan in the famous Scopes Trial; Clarence Darrow appealed fallaciously to authority. Price went on to study eschatology from a historicist’s perspective that led him to publish “Time of the End,” which has contributed to the wisdom in opening the book of Revelation.

 

One must do a tremendous amount of research to fine such doctrine today, which makes it was rare as gold, silver and precious stones. It is the gold tried in fire. With such knowledge we are able to discern the doctrines of gold, silver and precious stones from those that are wood, hay and stubble.  

 

To identify the little horn or fifth head, one must look at the criteria in Daniel and Revelation to find the power that rose at the end of the Roman Empire. Revelation 13:2 states that the dragon, the Roman Empire, gave its power and his throne and great authority to the beast from the sea. One has to have a grasp of the history of the Roman Empire to decipher what power arose to wield control of the defunct Roman Empire and upon the very seat that Rome held its dominion. Revelation 13 also maintains that the beast from the sea also has a likeness to the Greek, Persian, and Babylonian empires by the description of the beast,

 

Revelation 13

2   And the beast that I saw was like a leopard; its feet were like a bear's, and its mouth was like a lion's mouth. And to it the dragon gave his power and his throne and great authority.

 

The leopard, bear and lion are the beasts in Daniel 7 and what they all had in common is that they held established religions, they held no separation between religion and state.

 

The mystery of the seven heads begins with grasping the evidence that the final manifestation of Satan’s power is the revival of the fifth head or king, which is in our past, while the sixth king reigns now.

 

And identifying the fifth, sixth and seventh heads is the subject of future videos. 


See Video and please like and subscribe. We need your help to build our channel!  

 






Saturday, May 11, 2024

The Philadelphian Church Era


by Jerry Huerta

copyright 2024

Historicism holds the seven churches as literal, symbolic, and prophetic. In the prophetic sense, knowing the ethos or the defining spirit or mood of the Church in a particular historical period corresponds with the letters to the churches. The ethos of specific eras of the Church is not ignored by those who value knowledge and understanding,


The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction… How long, ye simple ones, will ye love simplicity? and the scorners delight in their scorning, and fools hate knowledge? (Proverbs 1:722)​

Church history follows the letters to the churches. Respectively, we live in an ethos of a commercial society, and according to the prophetic sense, the Church in our day is market-driven, influenced by our market-driven society,

And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God… Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked. (Revelation 3:1417)​

Seeking God and pursuing knowledge allows us to discern the characteristics of different church eras, which affirms the letter to the Church in Laodicea reflects our current ethos.

Understanding the ideal ethos of the Church, often referred to as the city on a hill, is crucial, insomuch Christ praised the church in Philadelphia. Philadelphia represents a brief but true restoration of the Church before entering the era of the Laodicea in modern times. Most historicists and even futurists agree that Sardis represents the Reformation based on the interpretation of the name. Historicist David Wilcoxson explains the meaning of Sardis,

is the “escaping one,” or those who “come out,” so it’s an excellent symbol of the church era during the Reformation period when the Protestants preached the Gospel.[1]​

The ethos of Sardis was outlined in Paul’s letter to the Corinthians,

Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty. (2 Corinthians 6:14-18)​

Protestantism escaped the ecclesiocracy of the Papacy, only to be caught in the unholy union again, as documented by former associate editor of Ministry Magazine, Orley M. Berg,

The letter to Sardis is strikingly appropriate to the post-Reformation period of the church, a period fittingly described as “the age of dead orthodoxy.” Appropriate dates suggested for the Sardis period are from the close of the Council of Trent in 1563 to the beginning of the great religious awakening in 1734.​
Instead of continuing its work of restoration, the Reformation committed the great error of submitting the church to the protection and support of civil authorities. Although separating from the established church, Protestants became subject to the state. In so doing, the church was forced to compromise some of the basic tenets of evangelical Protestantism and to protect her creeds in endless controversies.​
This greatly contributed to spiritual deterioration. Church life largely became little more than form and ceremony; preaching centered on promoting right thinking, with little regard for the condition of the heart. According to Newman, the church historian, personal conversion, even in the case of ministers of the Gospel, seems not to have been expected.[2]​

Only Christ lawfully possesses the authority residing in both miter and crown, authority over matters in church and temporal affairs, and the latter consummated at his return (Psalm 110). The Papacy’s attempt to wield power in both jurisdictions as an ecclesiocracy is what made it blasphemous, fulfilling Daniel 7:8 and Revelation 13:5. Protestantism separated itself from the blasphemous power of the Papacy but then held intercourse with the princes of the earth, which is why Sardis is judged almost dead, and many arrayed in defiled garments,

And unto the angel of the church in Sardis write; These things saith he that hath the seven Spirits of God, and the seven stars; I know thy works, that thou hast a name that thou livest, and art dead. (Revelation 3:1)​

Historians such as sociologist George M. Thomas concur,

The Reformation found its first alliance with the territorial prince, partly because of a mutual interest in undermining imperial church authority, but basically because of a similar ontology based on rationalizing principles and a common acceptance of a rational central authority (Walzer 1965). The spread of the Reformation throughout the town councils must be interpreted in the larger political context of its isomorphism with the prince as well as with the town’s increasing dependence on and incorporation into the central authority.[3]​

Berg goes on to verify that “there were faithful ones in Sardis,”

Truly it could be said of the church in the Sardis period, “Thou hast a name that thou livest, and art dead.”​
But, as in every period of the church, there were faithful ones in Sardis. God declared, “Thou hast a few names even in Sardis which have not defiled their garments; and they shall walk with me in white: for they are worthy” (verse 4).​
During this time, a third force was at work, in addition to both Rome and the established churches of the Reformation. Known as the Radical Reformation, it advocated the principle of a free church in a free state.[4]​

Berg comments further on the Radical Reformers,

The hallmark of the Radical Reformers was their zeal for New Testament Christianity and their emphasis on complete freedom for each believer to worship God according to his own conscience…​
History testifies that the basic principles of American democracy had their roots, not in the established churches of the Reformation, but in the so-called “sects” of the third force, or Radical Reformation. Through these groups the true spirit of the evangelical Reformation was preserved and advanced.[5]​

Berg verifies the origins of the movement that led to the Philadelphian era. The spirit or ethos of a free state abides where “rulers are the servants and the people,” which Benjamin Franklin and the founders of the United States held.[6] This is the ethos of the Philadelphian era, which Christ affirmed,

But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Ye know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them. But it shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister; And whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant: Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many. (Matthew 20:25-28)​

The rules of the unbelievers cannot resist the carnal nature to subjugate and exploit the people under them. However, a free state is founded upon the principles of a more perfect union, one of the common good, a pledge to domestic tranquility, the common defense, and the general welfare to posterity. This was the pledge to the people of the United States and why it was in America that the Philadelphian ethos flourished for a brief interval. American evangelical author Nancy R. Pearcey documents this time as one in which the people briefly held the ethos of the common good, as opposed to self-interests,

In the colonial period, the husband and father was regarded as the head of the household— and headship had a highly specific definition: It was defined as a divinely sanctioned office that conferred a duty to represent not his own individual interests but those of the entire household. This was an extension of the classical republican political theory discussed in chapter 10, in which a social institution (family, church, or state) was regarded as an organic unity where all shared in a common good. There was a “good” for individuals, but there was also a “good” of the whole, which was more than the sum of its parts— and this latter was the responsibility of the one in authority. He was called to sacrifice his own interests— to be disinterested— in order to represent the interests of the whole. 12 Husbands and fathers were not to be driven by personal ambition or self-interest but to take responsibility for the common good of the entire household.[7]​

The ethos of the Philadelphian era is one of promoting the common good, in which the rulers are the servants to the people, which was held for a brief period at the founding and colonial period in America, lasting into the mid-nineteenth century. The era culminated with the rise of the merchants, who were fostered by Protestant factions bent on self-interest. It was this latter faction that held intercourse with the princes, fulfilling the illustrations of the harlot Babylon,

And after these things I saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power; and the earth was lightened with his glory. And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities. (Revelation 18:1-5)​

We are called to come out of an ethos of self-interest and into one in which we uphold the common good, which is the ethos of the Philadelphian Church and the 144 thousand.


[1] David Wilcoxson, Revelation Timeline Decoded, Independently published (January 14, 2021) 257.

[2] Orley M. Berg, Sardis The Dead Church, Ministry Magazine, November 1978, 17.

[3] George M. Thomas, Revivalism and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press; Revised edition (January 19, 1998), 147.

[4] Berg, Sardis The Dead Church

[5] Berg, Sardis The Dead Church

[6] July 26, 1787: A Last Debate before Adjourning, July 26, 1787: A Last Debate before Adjourning (U.S. National Park Service)

[7] Nancy R. Pearcey, TOTAL TRUTH Liberating Christianity from Its Cultural Captivity, Crossway; Study Guide edition (February 28, 2008), 328.

See Video and please like and subscribe. We need your help to build our channel!  





Saturday, October 7, 2023

Where There is Wisdom

 By Jerry Huerta

copyright 2023

Where there is wisdom, Revelation 17:10-11 establishes that the scarlet beast “was and is not” while the sixth king “is,” making it one of the fallen five and the revived eighth king. There are seven kings, of which five have already fallen, and one is presently ruling, with one yet to come. When the seventh king arrives, he will reign briefly, and then the scarlet beast that reigned before the sixth king will rise to become the eighth. The beast that was and is not is the eighth, one of the seven, specifically the fifth; the little horn is the beast that goes into perdition in Revelation when Daniel is held as the precedent in interpreting Revelation.

This passage in Revelation 17 challenges the preterist and futurist interpretations of Revelation. Preterists must show that in John's time, the first advent, there was an emperor who preceded a sixth one, suffered a deadly wound, and was revived as the eighth. No historical account supports the Roman emperors in such circumstances at Christ's first advent. On the other hand, futurists also assert the sixth king is of John's time and must show how their antichrist “was” before this first advent kingdom. All such explanations are fallacious and without merit. The passage is prefaced with the need for wisdom in discernment, which excludes the futurist's and preterists’ accounts.

The evidence that the woman sits upon seven mountains also ties the woman to the beasts in Daniel 7. Futurist John Walvoord concedes the true interpretation of the mountains even as he mistakenly holds the sixth king is of John’s time,

The seven heads of the beast, however, are said to be symbolic of seven kings described in verse 10. Five of these are said to have fallen, one is in contemporary existence, that is, in John’s lifetime, the seventh is yet to come and will be followed by another described as the eighth, which is the beast itself. In the Greek there is no word for “there,” thus translated literally, the phrase is “and are seven kings.” The seven heads are best explained as referring to seven kings who represent seven successive forms of the kingdom… The mountains, then, are not piles of material rocks and earth at all, but royal or imperial powers, declared to be such by the angel himself.[1]​


Walvoord affirms that the Greek has no word for “there,” which makes the heads and mountains also seven kings in the passage; the heads, mountains, and kings are appositives; John renames the kingdoms in Daniel 7 and prophesies there are seven in all, renaming them as seven heads and seven mountains and seven kings, but Walvoord incorrectly attempts to add Egypt and Assyria to Daniel’s count,

Thus, then, we ascertain and identify the sixth in the list, which shows what sort of kings the angel meant. Of the same class with this, and belonging to the same category, there are five others—five which had then already run their course and passed away. But what five imperial mountains like Rome had been and gone, up to that time? Is history so obscure as not to tell us with unmistakable certainty? Preceding Rome the world had but five great names or nationalities answering to imperial Rome, and those scarce a schoolboy ought to miss. They are Greece, Persia, Babylon, Assyria, and Egypt; no more, and no less. And these all were imperial powers like Rome.[2]​


Nevertheless, Daniel commences with the imperial power of Babylon, making Rome the fourth kingdom and the little horn the one whose dominion is taken away and given to the saints as a result of the judgment beforehand,

But the judgment shall sit, and they shall take away his dominion, to consume and to destroy it unto the end. And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him. (Daniel 7:26-27)​


The preceding verses 23-25 affirm that the little horn’s dominion is taken and given to the saints at the “end,” establishing it as the fifth mountain or imperial power with its own dominion that supplants the fourth beast, Rome, after its fall.

Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces. And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings. And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time. (Daniel 7:23-25)​


Not only does the little horn supplant the Roman empire, but it also endures until the saints receive their reward, which John prophesied as the last trumpet in Revelation 11:15-19. The circumstances support that the little horn in Daniel is the revived or ascended eighth king in Revelation 17. This also agrees with the scriptural and historical proof that the scarlet beast, the papacy, reigns before the sixth king and ascends as the eighth king. The papacy was wounded almost to death by Protestant liberalism that enriched the merchants. The papacy is the beast wars with Christ at his return in Revelation 19:19. One cannot devise a futurist or preterist narrative that accounts for the evidence the eighth king is one of the fallen five, insomuch as it “was and is not.”

[1] John F. Walvoord, Revelation (The John Walvoord Prophecy Commentaries), Moody Publishers; New edition, April 1, 2011), 255

[2] John F. Walvoord, The Revelation of Jesus Christ, 1966, by The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago




This post is a postscript to the book above, which is available here.



Saturday, September 9, 2023

The True Structuring of Revelation

copyright 2023

by Jerry Huerta 


History shows that liberal Protestantism fostered the rise of secularism, which enriched the merchants, exposing it as the Mystery Babylon in Revelation. The research of Michael Tigar, George M. Thomas, Davide Cantoni, Jeremiah Dittmar, Noam Yuchtman, E. J. Hobsbawm, Bernard Bailyn, Mark A. Noll, and Nancy R. Pearcey agree that Protestant liberalism fostered secularism by consorting with the kings of the earth. The Protestants’ part in taking the legitimization of civil government away from Roman Catholicism to establish secular civil institutions is a fact that triggers many because it affirms Historicism. Protestant liberalism intoxicated society with autonomy and individualism, which forcefully supplanted the feudal ecumenical community.

 

For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. (Revelation 18:3)

 

Futurists and preterists often disregard irrefutable evidence and promote false narratives.


The actual narrative deems it impossible to interpret Revelation through a preterist lens, with their misrepresentations of temporal indicators, because ancient Jerusalem did not contribute to the prosperity of the merchants of the earth. The pagan Romans, Daniel’s fourth beast, enriched the merchants, and pagans cannot be construed as a harlot from a covenant perspective. Only God’s people are condemned for such covenant violations, and Jeremiah is the precedent.

 

For the house of Israel and the house of Judah have dealt very treacherously against me, saith the LORD… As a cage is full of birds, so are their houses full of deceit: therefore they are become great, and waxen rich. They are waxen fat, they shine: yea, they overpass the deeds of the wicked: they judge not the cause, the cause of the fatherless, yet they prosper; and the right of the needy do they not judge. (Jeremiah 5:11, 27-28)

 

Such evidence also deems it impossible to interpret Revelation through a futurist’s lens because the merchants of the earth have gained significant influence and riches for nearly two centuries from the impact of Protestantism, not some future phenomenon by the Jews. This reality regarding the two antagonists in Revelation - Babylon and the merchants - confirms Historicism. Futurists and preterists must make up alternate realities. 

 

Before the rise of Protestantism, the papacy played a role in legitimizing civil government in the West, and history shows that it bestowed kings with their crowns. This is seen in the shift of crowns to horns in Revelation 13:1. In modern times, the power given the beast to “overcome the saints” in Chapter 13 has been taken away by Protestantism, as shown by the missing crowns in Chapter 17. These details confirm that Revelation 13 is a historical account of the past.

 

Furthermore, Daniel 2:44 states that Christ returns in the days of the ten kings, not the Roman Empire. Rome ends, and the little horn rises amongst the ten horns in Daniel 7:8, corresponding to the beast rising from the sea in Revelation. This affirms we are to look for the little horn after the Roman empire ends, not some made-up neo-Rome as futurists surmise. The beast is wounded when the sixth king reigns, as shown by the phrase “was, and is not” in Revelation 17:9-11. The sixth king rises from the earth, and its image is the seventh.

 

Based on the Hebrew cultus, the seven typical feasts in the Hebrew calendar, Revelation Chapter 1 begins a linear narration that leads up to Christ’s return in Chapter 11, illustrating Christ’s mediation during the inter-advent age. Chapters 1-11 describe Christ’s intercession typified by the Aaronic high priest starting “between the porch and the altar” and ending at the Holy of Holies, before “the ark of his testament” (Revelation 1:13, 11:19).

 

Developmental guidelines and historical evidence affirm John’s recap from the beginning of the first advent in Chapter 12 until the second in 19, followed by Christ’s millennial reign. Revelation 12 recaps the first advent to reveal the judgment upon Satan and the wicked; Chapters 13 and 17 follow a linear narrative. The accurate structuring of Revelation maintains the principle affirmed by Peter that judgment begins with the house of God in Chapters 1-11 and concludes with those “that obey not the gospel of God” in Chapters 12-19 (1 Peter 4:17). Prolepses, like the sixth seal and the vials in Chapter 16, occur intermittently in the texts.

 

In returning to the merchants’ narrative, history affirms that war accompanied the rise of the merchants, which secularist, lawyer, law professor, and author Michael Tigar verifies,

 

The rapid rise of manufactures, particularly in England, gradually absorbed the vagrants and dispossessed. With the advent of manufacture, the various nations entered into a competitive relationship. The struggle for trade was fought by war, protective duties and prohibitions, whereas earlier the nations, in so far as they were connected at all, had carried on an inoffensive exchange with each other. Trade from now on had a political significance. To begin the march to industrial capitalism, to impose new economic forms, to share by right or conquest or theft in the wealth of the New World, to maintain a balance of trade such that more wealth flowed into a country than left it— all of these things were accomplished at a great price.1

 

Tigar referred to the vagrants and dispossessed who resulted from the English Enclosure Laws. These laws evicted many peasants from their land so that feudal lords could commercialize it and benefit from the expanding trade that came with the discovery of the New World. The displaced individuals were then absorbed by the manufacturing industry as cheap labor, which is another ramification of the rise of the merchants. Copious evidence confirms that the rise of merchants led to wars over trade, protective duties, and prohibitions. The most well-known examples of such conflicts were the two world wars. At Yale and Princeton's trade and war conference, Ronald Findlay of Columbia University and Kevin O'Rourke of Trinity College Dublin presented a thesis on the link between trade and war during the time of rising merchants,

 

The Industrial Revolution enabled the European powers to extend their sway from the coastal regions of Asia and Africa deep into the interiors, using armed steamboats to sail up the rivers and breech-loading rifles and later machine guns to sweep aside native resistance… As the Industrial Revolution proceeded in Europe and later in the United States and Japan the rising demand for primary products saw the emergence of export economies in Southeast Asia, Africa and Latin America during the era from 1870 to1914… The First World War was at least partly due to imperial rivalry between Britain and France on the one hand and Germany on the other. In the Second World War both Germany and Japan were to a large extent motivated by pressure to relieve perceived shortages and lack of access to industrial raw materials and fuel supplies…

 

The attack on the Soviet Union was also calculated to give Japan a free hand in the East against the British, French and Dutch colonies in Southeast Asia with their rich oil and other natural resources. Japan, always acutely conscious of her deficiency in natural resources, had already occupied Manchuria in 1932 to exploit its iron ore and to develop heavy industry, and provoked war with China in 1937… The stage was thus set for a global conflict between the “Heartland” and the “Rimland”, the land powers of Eurasia versus the sea powers of the Atlantic and Pacific, which had long been anticipated by the geopolitical theorists Halford Mackinder (1904) and Alfred Thayer Mahan (1890). War, trade and natural resources were once again fatefully intertwined, on a global scale.2

 

According to Tigar, the emergence of merchants also resulted in a displacement of people from their land. This phenomenon is a well-documented part of modern history, fueling the Industrial Revolution. The shift from rural to urban living resulted from treating food and labor as commodities for commercial gain. This practice started in England with the exploitation of factory workers. Still, it quickly became a global trend, driven by the desire for cheap food. John Hodges, a scientist, testified about the first attempt at globalization, which aligns with the consequences of the rise of merchants and the dispossessing of impoverished people from their farms,

 

Globally, food production per person has been increasing, but 840 million people (13%) suffer from under-nutrition, malnutrition or famine because socioeconomic systems inhibit equitable distribution (FAO, 2004).… The long-term answer to feeding the world sustainably does not lie in shipping food from the West. Any economic system which separates the poor from their land or takes away their market for selling food inevitably perpetuates poverty, increases hunger and adds to the threat of famine. Globalizing agriculture and food on the basis of free trade runs that risk.… Western governments know from their own experience over the last 200 years that food cannot be treated simply as a tradable commodity subject to unrestrained capitalism without sooner or later running into socio-economic imbalances: hunger, rationing, famine, lost capacity to feed a nation, negative effects with hidden costs, obesity, mass movements of people off the land, unemployment etc.—all of these are Western socio-economic experiences.3

 

Finally, it is essential to acknowledge the role of Protestant missionary imperialism (PMI) in the growth of merchant culture and trade expansion. It cannot be ignored that after more than twelve centuries of the papal system, the "spirit of Protestantism" gave rise to capitalism and a market-focused society that benefited merchants and liberal Protestants. Theologian and professor emeritus of pastoral theology Michael Sievernich supports the link between PMI and the initial push toward globalization,

 

Christianity had spread throughout the European continent during a thousand year process that extended from Late Antiquity to the Late Middle Ages. With its variety of missionary methods (e.g. peaceful mission, mission by coercion and the conversion of tribes by first converting the ruler), Christianity had reached all European peoples. It extended from Greece to Scandinavia and Iceland; it stretched from Ireland in the far west to Eastern Europe’s West Slavic and Baltic peoples. This process had brought forth European Christianity which, in turn and by stages, initiated missionary activity beyond Europe’s borders. The religious missionary enterprise was generally tied to the economically driven power politics involved in European overseas expansion, a process of globalization.4

 

Professor of Contemporary History at the University of Marburg, Benedikt Stuchtey, also affirms the ramifications of PMI,

 

colonial rule caused complex competitions among Europeans just as much as among the indigenous population in the colonies, that it was able to simultaneously create cooperation and close webs of relationships between conquerors and the conquered, and that it was never at any time free of violence and war, despotism, arbitrariness and lawlessness.5

 

Here we have the completion of all the elements that comprise the illustration of the four horsemen of the seven seals. PMI “went forth conquering, and to conquer” that took “peace from the earth, and that they should kill one another,” while calling out the price of a “measure of wheat” and “three measures of barley,” which led to “hunger” and “death” of the dispossessed and impoverished.

 

PMI and its consequence are illustrated by the prophetic era of the Laodicean church, which overlaps with the seventh-month autumnal festivals, and “the time of the end” in Daniel 8:17. The Laodicean epoch maintains terminological and thematic correspondence with the seven trumpets, the sealing in Revelation 7, and the last-days proclamations in Revelation 14. In continuing to substantiate this correspondence, it must be noted that a symbolic theological connection exists between PMI and the symbolism of the archer on the white horse. Scripturally, white is associated with righteousness (Daniel 7:9; Matthew 17:2; Mark 9:3; Luke 9:29; Revelation 1:12–14, 6:11, 19:8, 20:11). While horses predominantly represent apostasy for reliance upon their illicit power (Isaiah 2:6–7, 30:15–17; Amos 2:15), which is indicative of the end day covenant apostasy prophesied of in the NT (Matthew 5:13, 24:12; 2 Thessalonians 2:1–12; 1 Timothy 4:1–3; Romans 14:10; 2 Corinthians 5:10). In Jeremiah, “horsemen and bowmen” represent God’s agent Babylon in judging Jerusalem because “as a cage is full of birds, so are their houses full of deceit: therefore, they are become great, and waxen rich” (Jeremiah 4:29, 5:27).

 

Two great wars, market-driven exploitation of the poor and death, are the legacy of PMI, which is easily seen in the illustrations accompanying the red, black, and pale horses. And, most importantly, we cannot forget that the judgments illustrated by the trumpets must commence with God’s house, in agreement with 1 Peter 4:17. Peter’s principle substantiates that the exploitation described by the four horsemen—the oppression the souls lamenting in the fifth seal—develops from within God’s house in correspondence with OT precedent and NT prophecy (Isaiah 5:8–9, 10:2, 33:15; Jeremiah 34:8–17; Ezekiel 22:29, 45:9; Amos 8:2–7; Micah 2:2; Matthew 23:4; James 5:1–6). God’s people will be judged before the judgment that falls on the little horn, according to 1 John 4:17.

 

 

1-Michael Tigar, Law and the Rise of Capitalism, Monthly Review Press (June 1, 2000) 173

 

2-Ronald Findlay, Kevin O’Rourke, War, Trade and Natural Resources: A Historical Perspective, paper was presented at the Yale- Princeton Conference on Trade and War, April, 2010, https://sites.socsci.uci.edu/~mrgarfin/OUP/papers/Findlay.pdf

 

3-John Hodges, “Cheap Food and Feeding the World Sustainably,” Livestock Production, Science 92 (2005), 1 –16, accessed October 27, 2018,

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.554.8233&rep=rep1&type=pdf

 

4-Michael Sievernich, “Christian Mission,” European History Online (EGO), Institute of European History (IEG), 2011-05-19, 3, accessed October 27, 2018,

http://ieg-ego.eu/en/threads/europe-and-the-world/mission/michael-sievernich-christian-mission

 

5-Benedikt Stuchtey, “Colonialism and Imperialism, 1450–1950,” European History Online (EGO), Institute of European History (IEG), Mainz 2011-01-24, 2, accessed October 27, 2018,

http://ieg-ego.eu/en/threads/backgrounds/colonialism-and-imperialism




This post is a postscript to the book above, which is available here.